12/1/2022 0 Comments Lacan floating signifierWe demonstrate how radicalization, when operating as a floating signifier, can significantly influence officers' perceptions and front-line prison operations. Officers redefine radicalization to fit interpretive frames around religion and race, gang membership, and mental health, irrespective of whether stereotypical extremists exist in a given prison. Pages: 172-174: In this section Zizek defends Lacans point de capiton from. Through 131 semistructured interviews with Canadian correctional officers, we demonstrate how radicalization functions as a floating signifier in prison, influencing officer thought and behavior in meaningful ways while eluding easy definition. of floating signifiers into a unified field by fixing their meaning. However, officers' under-standings of radicalization may not conform with accepted definitions. Consequently, radicalization has become a meaningful topic for prison staff, one which shapes their daily actions and perceptions. Let’s think of the system of signifiers (language) as being like a ’15 puzzle’ and ask ourselves what systematic properties define how the ‘game’ of the 15 puzzle (language) works. Signifiers (all signs) constitute a system, and that system has systematic properties. Low-level correctional officers now perceive themselves as being directly responsible for detecting radicalization on their units. Let’s break Lacan’s idea into its component parts. The resulting prospect of prison radicalization has contributed to widespread risk responsibilitization among prison staff. The number of people incarcerated for extremist actions has grown over the past decades.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2022
Categories |